Publications

 

Books

Gibson, B.S., Folk, C.L., Theeuwes, J., & Kingstone, A. (2008). Psychology Press LTD/Lord & Taylor: London, UK.

Folk, C.L., & Gibson, B.S. (2001). Attraction, Distraction, and Action: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Attentional Capture. Elsevier: Oxford, UK.

 

Refereed Publications

(Note: ¹indicates graduate student author; ² indicates undergraduate student author)

 

Gibson, B.S., Trost, J.M.¹, & Maxwell, S.E. (in press). Top-down attention control does not imply voluntary attention control for all individuals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

Robison, M.K.², Trost, J.M.¹, Schor, D.¹, Gibson, B.S., & Healey, M.K. (in press). Pupillary correlates of individual differences in long-term memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

Miller, R.W. ¹, Gondoli, D.M., Steeger, C.M., & Gibson, B.S. (in press). Parenting adolescents with ADHD: Maternal and child contributions and the intervening role of stress. Journal of Child and Family Studies.

Gibson, B.S., Healey, M.K., Schor, D.¹, & Gondoli, D.M. (2021). Time and space in the similarity structure of memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28, 2003-2011.

Gibson, B.S., Pauszek¹, J.R., Trost¹, J.M., & Wenger, M.J. (2021). The misrepresentation of spatial uncertainty in visual search: Single- vs. Joint-Distribution Probability Cues. Special Issue for Charles W. Eriksen. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 83, 603-623.

Schor, D. ¹, Brodersen, A.S. ¹, & Gibson, B.S. (2020). A model comparison approach reveals individual variation in the scope and control of attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27, 1006-1013.

Pauszek, J.R.¹, & Gibson, B.S. (2019). Dealing with distractors in the spatial cueing paradigm can reflect the strategic influence of cognitive effort minimization rather than a limit to selective attention (Special Issue: Dealing with distractors in visual search). Visual Cognition, 3-4, 367-383.

Gibson, B.S., Healey, M.K., & Gondoli, D.M. (2019). ADHD reflects impaired externally directed and enhanced internally directed attention in the immediate free recall task. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 128, 173-183.

Comas, M.¹, Valentino, K., Johnson, A.F.¹, Gibson, B.S., & Taylor, C.² (2018). Differential roles of resistance to proactive interference and suppression of prepotent responses in overgeneral memory. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 61, 45-50.

Biggs, A.T., & Gibson, B.S. (2018). Opening the window: Size of the attentional window dominates perceptual load and familiarity in visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44, 1780-1798.

Ralph, K.J.¹, Gibson, B.S., & Gondoli, D.M. (2018). Parent ratings of working memory are uniquely related to performance-based measures of secondary memory but not primary memory. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 40, 841-851.

Pauszek, J.R.¹, & Gibson, B.S. (2018). The least costs hypothesis: A rational analysis approach to the voluntary symbolic control of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44, 1199-1215.

Gibson, B.S., & Gondoli, D.M. (2018). Unmasking the component-general and component-specific aspects of primary and secondary memory in the immediate free recall task. Memory & Cognition, 46, 349-360.

Gibson, B.S., Gondoli, D.M., Ralph, K.J.¹, & Sztybel, P.¹ (2018). Application of the dual-component model of working memory to ADHD: Greater secondary memory deficit despite confounded cognitive differences. Child Neuropsychology, 24, 61-81.

Ralph, K.J.¹, Gibson, B.S., Gondoli, D.M., Sztybel, P.¹, Pauszek, J.R.¹, Miller, R.W.¹, Litzow, E.² (2017). Targeting the three stages of retrieval from secondary memory in a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized working memory training study. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 1, 455-477.

Sztybel, P.¹, & Gibson, B.S. (2017). Functional consequences of compositional spatial representations elicited during conceptual control of visual spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146, 1009-1025.

Pauszek, J.R.¹, Sztybel, P.¹, & Gibson, B.S. (2017). Evaluating Amazon’s Mechanical Turk for psychological research on the symbolic control of attention. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 1969-1983.

Miller, R.W.¹, Gondoli, D.M., Gibson, B.S., Steeger, C.M.¹, & Morrissey. R.A.¹ (2017). Contributions of maternal attention-deficit hyperactivity and oppositional defiant disorder symptoms to parenting. Parenting: Science and Practice, 17, 281-300.

Pauszek, J.R.¹, & Gibson, B.S. (2016). High spatial validity is not sufficient to elicit voluntary shifts of attention. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 78, 2110-2123.

Steeger, C.M.¹, Gondoli, D.M., Gibson, B.S., & Morrissey, R.A.¹ (2016). Combined cognitive and parent training interventions for adolescents with ADHD and their mothers: A randomized controlled trial. Child Neuropsychology, 22, 394-419.

Gibson, B.S., & Sztybel, P.¹ (2015). What laboratory studies of symbolic spatial cues reveal about the control of attention in everyday life. In J. Fawcett, E.F. Risko, & A. Kingstone (Eds.), The Handbook of Attention. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

Hunt, A.D., Kronenberger, W.G., Dunn, D.W., Gibson, B.S., & Gondoli, D.M.  (2014). Predictors of change in short-term memory span following working memory training. Acta Neuropsychologica, 12, 445-458.

Radvansky, G.A., Gibson, B.S., McNerney, M.W.¹ (2014). Working memory, situation models, and synesthesia. American Journal of Psychology, 127, 325-342.

Gibson, B.S., Gondoli, D.M., Johnson, A.C.¹, & Robison, M.K.² (2014). Recall initiation strategies must be controlled in training studies that use immediate free recall tasks to measure the components of working memory capacity across time. Child Neuropsychology, 20, 536-556.

Gibson, B.S., & Sztybel, P.¹ (2014). The spatial semantics of symbolic attention control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 271-276.

Gibson, B.S., & Sztybel, P.¹ (2014). Guiding attention to specific locations by combining symbolic information about direction and distance: Are human observers direction experts? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 731-751.

Biggs, A.T.¹, & Gibson, B.S. (2014). Visual salience can co-exist with dilution during visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 7-14.

Gibson, B.S., & Gondoli, D.M. (2013). A dual-component analysis of working memory training. In H. St Clair-Thompson (Ed.), Working memory: Developmental differences, component processes and improvement mechanisms (pp. 201-217). Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: Hauppauge, NY.

Biggs, A.T.¹, & Gibson, B.S. (2013). Learning to ignore salient color distractors during serial search: Evidence for experience-dependent attention allocation strategies. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, pp. 1-13. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00326.

Gibson, B.S., Gondoli, D.M., Kronenberger, W.G., Johnson, A.C.¹, Steeger, C.M.¹ & Morrissey. R.A.¹ (2013). Exploration of an adaptive training regimen that can target the secondary memory component of working memory capacity. Memory & Cognition, 41, 726-737.

Gibson, B.S., Radvansky, G.A., Johnson, A.C.¹, & McNerney, M.W.¹ (2012). Grapheme-color synesthesia can enhance immediate memory without disrupting the encoding of relational cues. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 1172-1177.

Gibson, B.S., Kronenberger, W.G., Gondoli, D.M., Johnson, A.C.¹, Morrissey, R.M.¹, & Steeger, C.M.¹ (2012). Component analysis of simple span vs. complex span adaptive working memory exercises: A randomized, controlled trial. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 179-184.

Gibson, B.S., Gondoli, D.M., Johnson, A.C.¹, Steeger, C.M.¹, & Morrissey, R.M.¹ (2012). The future promise of Cogmed working memory training. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 214-216.

Davis, G.J.¹, & Gibson, B.S., (2012). Going rogue in the spatial cuing paradigm: High spatial validity is insufficient to elicit voluntary shifts of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1192-1201.

Biggs, A.T.¹, Kreager, R.D.¹, Gibson, B.S., Crowell, C., & Villano, M. (2012). Semantic and affective salience: The role of meaning and preference in attentional capture and disengagement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 531-541.

Gibson, B.S., Thompson, A.N.¹, Davis, G.J.¹, & Biggs, A.T.¹ (2011). Going the distance: Extra-symbolic contributions to the symbolic control of spatial attention. Visual Cognition, 19, 1237-1261.

Gibson, B.S., Gondoli, D.M., Johnson, A.C.¹, Steeger, C.M.¹, Dobrzenski, B.A.¹, & Morrissey, R.A.¹ (2011). Component Analysis of Verbal versus Spatial Working Memory Training in Adolescents with ADHD: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Child Neuropsychology, 17, 546-563.

Radvansky, G.A., Gibson, B.S., & McNerney, M.¹ (2011). Synesthesia and memory: Color congruency, von Restorff and false memory effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 219-229.

Gibson, B.S., & Davis, G.J.¹ (2011). Grounding spatial language in the motor system: Reciprocal interactions between spatial semantics and orienting. Visual Cognition, 19, 79-116.

Gibson, B.S., Gondoli, D.M., Flies, A.C.¹, Dobrzenski, B.A.¹, & Unsworth, N. (2010). Application of the dual-component model of working memory to ADHD. Child Neuropsychology, 16, 60-79.

Biggs, A.T.¹, & Gibson, B.S. (2010). Competition between color salience and perceptual load during visual selection can be biased by top-down set. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72, 53-64.

Gibson, B.S., Scheutz, M., & Davis, G.J.¹ (2009). Symbolic control of visual attention: Semantic constraints on the spatial distribution of attention. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 71, 363-374.   

Gibson, B.S., & Bryant, T.¹ (2008). The identity intrusion effect: Attentional capture or perceptual load? Visual Cognition, 16, 182-199.

Gibson, B.S., & Kingstone, A.F. (2006). Visual attention and the semantics of space: Beyond central and peripheral cues. Psychological Science, 17, 622-627.

Scheutz, M., & Gibson, B.S. (2006). Visual attention and the semantics of space: Evidence for two forms of symbolic control. In R. Sun & N. Miyake (Eds.) Proceedings of the 28^th Annual Cognitive Science Society, pp. 2123-2128.

Gibson, B.S., & Bryant, T.¹ (2005). Variation in cue duration reveals top-down modulation of involuntary orienting to uninformative symbolic cues. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 749-758.

Gibson, B.S., Eberhard, K.M., & Bryant, T.¹ (2005). Linguistically mediated visual search: The critical role of speech rate. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 276-281.

Wenger, M.J., & Gibson, B.S. (2004). Using hazard functions to assess changes in processing capacity in an attentional cuing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 708-719.

Gibson, B.S., & Peterson, M.A. (2001). Inattentional blindness and attentional capture: Evidence for attention-based theories of visual salience. In C.L. Folk & B.S. Gibson (Eds.), Attraction, Distraction, and Action: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Attentional Capture. Elsevier: Oxford, UK.

Gibson, B.S., & Jiang, Y.¹ (2001).  Visual marking and the perception of salience in visual search.  Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 59-73.

Gibson, B.S., & Amelio, J. L.² (2000).  Inhibition of return and attentional control settings.  Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 496-504.           

Gibson, B.S., Li, L., Skow, E.², Salvagni, K.S.¹, & Cooke, L.² (2000) Searching for one versus two identical targets: When visual search has a memory.  Psychological Science, 11, 324-327.

Gibson, B.S., & Jiang, Y.¹ (1998).  Surprise! An unexpected color singleton does not capture attention in visual search.  Psychological Science, 9, 176-182.

Gibson, B.S., & Kelsey, E.M.² (1998).  Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 699-706.

Gibson, B.S. (1996).  Attentional capture and visual quality:  A challenge to the special role of abrupt onsets.  Journal of Experimental Psychology:  Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1496-1504.

Gibson, B.S. (1996).  The masking account of attentional capture:  A reply to Yantis and Jonides (1996).  Journal of Experimental Psychology:  Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1514-1520.

Gibson, B.S. (1994). Visual attention and objects: One versus two or convex versus concave?  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 203-207.

Gibson, B.S. & Egeth, H. (1994). Inhibition of return to object-based and environment-based locations. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 323-339.

Gibson, B.S. & Egeth, H. (1994). Inhibition and disinhibition of return: Evidence from temporal order judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 669-680.

Gibson, B.S. & Peterson, M.A. (1994). Does orientation-independent object recognition precede orientation-dependent recognition? Evidence from a cuing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 299-316.

Peterson, M.A. & Gibson, B.S. (1994). Must figure-ground organization precede object recognition?  An assumption in peril. Psychological Science, 5, 253-259.

Peterson, M.A. & Gibson, B.S. (1994). Object recognition contributions to figure-ground organization: Operations on outlines and subjective contour.  Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 551-564.

Yantis, S. & Gibson, B.S. (1994). Object continuity in apparent motion and attention. Special Issue: Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 198-204.    

Peterson, M.A. & Gibson, B.S. (1993). Shape recognition contributions to figure-ground organization in three-dimensional displays. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 383-429.

Peterson, M.A. & Gibson. B.S. (1991). Directing spatial attention within an object: Altering the functional equivalence of shape descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 170-182.

Peterson, M.A. & Gibson, B.S. (1991). The initial identification of figure-ground relationships: Contributions from shape recognition processes. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 199-202.

Gibson, B.S. (1985). The convergence of Kuhn and cognitive psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 4, 110-121.

Gibson, B.S. (1985). Reply: The convergence of Kuhn and cognitive psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 5, 80-86.

Peterson, M.A. & Gibson, B.S. (1991). The initial identification of figure-ground relationships: Contributions from shape recognition processes. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 199-202.

Gibson, B.S. (1985). The convergence of Kuhn and cognitive psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 4, 110-121.

Gibson, B.S. (1985). Reply: The convergence of Kuhn and cognitive psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 5, 80-86.

 

Manuscripts Under Review in Refereed Journals or In Preparation

 

Healey, M.K., Gibson, B.S., Uitvlugt, M., & Gondoli, D.M. (under review). Recall initiation instructions influence how space and time interact in memory.

Gibson, B.S., Healey, M.K., Uitvlugt, M., & Gondoli, D.M. (in preparation). Episodic memory in ADHD: A greater role for spatial similarity than for temporal similarity?

Gibson, B.S., & Trost, J.M. (in preparation). Felt agency during guided, misguided, and unguided visual search: Implications for theories of voluntary attention control.